Communists and Socialists: Are Their Presidential Candidacies a Potential Security Risk for the US?

As the 2020 US presidential election draws near, the landscape of candidates from various political backgrounds takes center stage. One particular element that has caught public attention is the emergence of several candidates who identify themselves as communists or socialists. While diverse political ideologies are an inherent part of democracy, concerns regarding security implications arise when these ideologies are intertwined with high-level political positions. In this article, we delve into the potential security risks associated with communist and socialist candidates running for the US presidency.

The Rise of Communist and Socialist Candidates

In recent years, the once largely marginalized ideologies of communism and socialism have gained limited traction within mainstream American politics. Candidates who adhere to these ideologies often advocate for a more equitable redistribution of wealth, extensive government intervention in the economy, and strengthening the social safety nets. While their intentions may appear noble on the surface, it is crucial to critically assess the security implications associated with implementing such policies at a national level.

National Security Concerns

The core tenets of communism and socialism frequently involve centralized control, whether through government ownership of resources or extensive government intervention in various aspects of society. As such, these ideologies can potentially compromise a nation's security by weakening the foundations of a market-driven economy, stifling private innovation, and undermining individual freedoms.

WHITE HOUSE REDS: Communists, Socialists & Security Risks Running for US President, 2020

by Trevor Loudon(Kindle Edition)

4.6 out of 5

FREE

Furthermore, the inherent nature of these ideologies raises concerns over secretive associations and potential alliances with countries that are hostile towards the United States. Given the historical context of the Cold War, a period marked by intense ideological conflicts, it is vital to ensure that those seeking the highest office in the country do not have hidden agendas or allegiances that could compromise national security.

Tracking Foreign Influence

Another factor that demands attention is the vulnerability of communist and socialist candidates to foreign influence. As these ideologies often promote an egalitarian society, they can attract individuals or organizations seeking to exploit the democratic processes of other nations for their own gain.

The infiltration of foreign entities, whether state-sponsored or not, into the decision-making process of a nation can have severe consequences. Espionage, sabotage, and the dissemination of influence can disrupt the democratic foundation upon which the United States stands. Therefore, it becomes vital for the nation to assess the potential risks associated with individuals subscribing to ideologies closely aligned with countries that hold opposing values and interests.

Protecting Democratic Values

A healthy democracy thrives on diversity of thought, ideas, and political ideologies. However, it is crucial to strike a balance between inclusiveness and safeguarding the principles upon which the nation was founded. The United States, with its long history of defending democratic values against authoritarian regimes, must ensure that presidential candidates possess the necessary qualifications, principles, and dedication to the interests of the American people.

The Role of Intelligence Agencies

Intelligence agencies play a key role in safeguarding national security interests. Evaluating the backgrounds, affiliations, and potential vulnerabilities of political candidates infused with communist or socialist ideologies becomes an area of priority for these agencies. Robust background checks, continuous monitoring, and timely information sharing between relevant authorities help ensure that any potential threats to national security are promptly addressed.

The presence of communist and socialist candidates in the 2020 US presidential election raises valid concerns about potential security risks. It becomes imperative for the nation's intelligence agencies, experts, and citizens to evaluate the ideologies and affiliations of these candidates to safeguard democratic values and national security interests. While diversity in political ideologies is crucial for the progress of any democratic society, it should not come at the expense of compromising the core principles upon which the country was built. The 2020 election serves as a crucial juncture for the American people to decide the path they want to tread and the values they want to uphold.

WHITE HOUSE REDS: Communists, Socialists & Security Risks Running for US President, 2020

by Trevor Loudon(Kindle Edition)

4.6 out of 5

FREE

On the show Fox & Friends on May 23, 2019, Donald Trump, Jr. said the 2020 election would be about "Communism versus Freedom". He was right. White House Reds profiles ten high profile contenders for the Democratic presidential nomination - all of them communists, socialists or security risks. White House Reds is the best researched and most shocking political exposé of this or any recent election cycle.